A fictitious road sign, implying that scales are not permitted beyond it

Beyond costs and benefits

We often act like economic beings, weighing up the pros and cons of options looking for the one with the best overall net benefit. But sometimes we don’t, and then we may find ourselves on thin ice.

Koen Smets
7 min readAug 4, 2023

--

Here is a thought experiment: imagine that a pharmaceutical company launches a safe pill with the remarkable ability to neutralize all alcohol in your blood within minutes, costing no more than about half a typical alcoholic drink. No matter how many pints, shots or glasses of wine you consumed, swallow one, and in the time to go to the loo, collect any belongings and put on your coat, you’ll be sober as a judge. Pubs, restaurants and clubs, and manufacturers of alcoholic drinks would undoubtedly be elated. So would the many people be who enjoy their drink, and who would enjoy more of it, were it not for the adverse consequences. With this miracle pill, they will wake up their normal witty and clear-headed self the next morning. No hangover. And of course, they will first be able to drive home safely, without risking driving bans and fines — perhaps best of all, no more drunk drivers would mean no more alcohol-related traffic collisions and victims. What’s not to like?

Good or questionable? Or both?

--

--

Koen Smets

Accidental behavioural economist in search of wisdom. Uses insights from (behavioural) economics in organization development. On Twitter as @koenfucius