I don’t think we are conned into believing we’ve run 2 miles, nor that we are conned into believing that we have drunk two cups of coffee when we manifestly haven’t. In my view treating biases and heuristics as ‘being conned’ is neither helpful nor accurate.

What does happen is that we believe a distance of X is nearer by when it is framed as (Y+X)-Y than when it is plainly X. That observation does not require any conning.

Written by

Accidental behavioural economist in search of wisdom. Uses insights from (behavioural) economics in organization development. On Twitter as @koenfucius

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store