Profit and other motives
Is the care sector incompatible with profit motives?
Some people take a dim view of profit. It evokes images of fat, top-hatted men raking it in. In the UK, that concept cannot provoke more outrage than if it is linked to the National Health Service (NHS), an institution only marginally less sacred than the Church of England. If health or social care are delivered by organizations that must make a profit, the idea that trade-offs will need to be made between profit and quality is not far-fetched. So, do those who oppose commercialization or privatization have a point? Should care be kept out of the hands of profit-seeking capitalists?
Motive needed
Very few people are able to meet their needs without any help from others. We cannot possibly grow all the food we need, make our own clothing, shelter and tools from scratch, let alone entertain or cure ourselves. So, what motivates these others to do something for us? In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith, widely regarded as the father of modern economics, put it thus: “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest. We address ourselves not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities, but of their advantages”.
