Thanks for the reply, Marco.

Suicide would offer no benefit to anyone: the payment would be made at the time of the binding agreement to donate your organs; the completion of the contract would happen after the death.

The problem with opt-out is the fact that implied, tacit agreement is morally questionable. Imagine there was a similar arrangement relating the destination of your assets after you die. The default is that it all goes to the state; if you disagree, you simply need to register your objection, and only then will your assets go to your heirs. Is that morally and politically acceptable?

Written by

Accidental behavioural economist in search of wisdom. Uses insights from (behavioural) economics in organization development. On Twitter as @koenfucius

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store